Page 1 of 1

What will the Fed do now?

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2024 9:02 am
by dan_s
Notes below are from HFI Research

Unemployment was released this morning. I was interested in it purely because the numbers have been so seemingly manipulated. Interestingly, Brian Wesbury opined sort of tongue and cheek with the way futures were acting this morning, it seems like someone got the number before the release.

Here is a link to the report: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Non-farm payroll was expected to be 161,000, came in at 142,000. 11.8% miss.

This report is the first employment report that people are paying very close attention to in the coming election. Despite the media’s onslaught every day for the last, I don’t know how many years, most people can put political stuff on the backburner until it matters, Labor Day until Election Day.

Inside this report, what I was really curious about was this:

The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for June was revised down by 61,000, from
+179,000 to +118,000, and the change for July was revised down by 25,000, from +114,000 to
+89,000. With these revisions, employment in June and July combined is 86,000 lower than
previously reported. (Monthly revisions result from additional reports received from businesses
and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal
factors.)

We never see upward revisions. Even the language they used in the release was unclear to mask the changes.

June was revised down 34.1%; 179k to 118k.

July was revised down 21.92%; 114k to 89k

If one takes the average of just those two revisions, it’s 28%. Assuming this month’s number is off by at least the average of the last two. That means it is probably 116k, or less.

Here is another maxim that seems to be true all the time. The Fed is always behind the curve. They were behind the curve in raising rates, and they will be behind the curve in lowering them.

The Fed can’t raise. The economy is way too weak. But, the Fed can’t lower aggressively due to the inflation numbers.

Inflation is a money creation problem, not a private market supply/demand problem. If the government cut spending, inflation would go away. See Argentina.
-------------------------
MY TAKE: We have a broken Federal Government. Wasteful spending is out of control. Our energy plan ("just build more windmills and solar panels") is dumb and dumber. We are going deeper in debt to fund foreign wars. We have a chance to fix it in November.

Re: What will the Fed do now?

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2024 9:11 am
by dan_s
Go see the Reagan movie for a reminder of what happen in America if we elect a strong leader.

From one of our members:
"It was so good to be reminded of what one cowboy/crusader did for America by standing true to God, his country and himself. It can be done again, but it's so much easier not to (which is also sadly evident in America's history). It was an uplifting reminder! (And I'd forgotten a lot of the world history that was going on, before and during his presidency.) Thank you for the ticket!"

"Two emotions I left with after watching Reagan last night: Love and Hope
This movie was a love story. Ronnie and “Nancy Pants” were so in love and they were a team. It was very sweet.
But most of all, I was filled with hope for our country. Ronald Reagan understood the exceptionalism of the United States and the importance of freedom and faith. And, geez Louise, he was tough!
I could say a lot more, but instead, I’m going to insist you see it for yourself."

I recently read a book about Teddy Roosevelt. He was a tough guy and not a politician. He was one of the most beloved presidents. We need a tough guy like Teddy to fix our broken government.

Re: What will the Fed do now?

Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2024 11:56 am
by mikelp
Reagan movie was great
Reagan stood up to the Soviet Union - evil empire
he called their bluff
he knew weakness only encourages aggression

a lesson that should have been learned after the 1938 Munich Agreement,
Neville Chamberlain's "Peace in our Time" deal with der Fuherer

in the words of an Italian Marxist philosopher:
(and no I am definitely NOT a Marxist, but his words apply equally today)

"History teaches, but has no pupils"