Shale technology

[setliff]

does this guy know what he is talking about?



COLUMN-Shale is dumb but booming. What if it gets smart?: Campbell 10/26 09:54 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Robert Campbell is a Reuters market analyst. The views expressed are his own)

By Robert Campbell

NEW YORK, Oct 26 (Reuters) - For all the hoopla surrounding the shale revolution in oil and gas markets, it is worth bearing in mind that the technology is still in its infancy.

It is hard not to be overwhelmed by the speed of the transformation hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is bringing to global oil and gas markets.

In the United States, fracking has spawned talk of re-industrialization, buoyed by cheap natural gas that will give North America a competitive edge over the rest of the world.

And shale oil production may lift U.S. crude output so quickly that the country becomes once again the world's largest producer of liquids within a decade.

Yet current techniques are in their infancy according to industry experts. There is considerable room for improvement, both in the application of force to reservoirs as well as in the location of "sweet spots" where fracking yields the best results.

Today hydraulic fracturing relies heavily on brute force and operators still count on a great deal of luck when completing wells, although the best operators are gaining an edge through research and development.

However, the scale of the opportunity from improvement is staggering.

Analysts at Bernstein Research argued this week, based on data from services firm Schlumberger, that a remarkable 80 percent of production from average shale wells comes from only a fifth of the fracking stages, and a staggering 50 percent of all fracking stages contribute no output whatsoever.

That suggests a huge amount of money spent blasting water and sand into the ground is being wasted. And that in turn points to a major focus of research in the oil services industry: improving completions to cut costs.

Lower costs may well open up additional shale basins for exploitation where the economic case today is simply not compelling.


PRIMITIVE WELLS

Already, modest reductions in costs and drilling time have allowed some operators in shale areas to substantially boost productivity.

Continental Resources, one of the top firms in North Dakota'sBakken Shale, trumpeted the role of technology and refined techniques in helping it achieve its 2014 production goal this year.

Higher production gives the firm more cash flow, which, in the custom of North American independent oil firms, it is plowing right back into exploration and development.

This is a major reason why shale-related output in North America has continued to outstrip projections. Lower costs lead to higher cash flows, which in turn lead to even more drilling than initially planned.

None of this is to say there are not significant challenges nor that some firms are hopelessly optimistic in their forecasts. But the current scope for technological improvement appears to remain considerable.

The prospect for technological advances in shale oil and gas extraction is one of the major reasons why some opponents of peak oil theories, like Nansen Saleri, a former Saudi Aramco executive who now heads upstream technology consultancy Quantum Reservoir Impact, are optimistic about the prospect for liquid fuels production.

"In a few years the techniques used today for fracking will be viewed as primitive," Saleri said in an interview this summer.

Finding the technologies that help streamline completion costs for hydraulically fractured wells as well as improving monitoring techniques to ensure wells and frack stages are better placed are the focus on intense research already.

Longer term, companies are already examining more radical improves, such as replacing pumped water with magnetic resonance techniques or other energy sources, in the fracking process.

Moreover as the technology matures and becomes less costly, it is likely to prove more portable than at present.

While North America seems uniquely suited to shale oil exploration at present due to deep capital markets and an oil and gas industry made up mostly of smaller, independent firms, lower cost technology may eventually erode this advantage.

That is the interesting question for global oil markets. If shale oil drilling techniques can be exported, will the balance of power shift? Or will the fact that major oil basins remain largely off-limits to private companies blunt the impact. (Editing by Kenneth Barry)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[dan_s]

At the SIPES seminar last Friday, several experts estimated that the shales may add another 2 million boepd to our production between now and 2020, but that is about it without a huge increase in capital expenditure and active rig count. Shale wells decline quickly, 40% to 50% in the first year. Therefore, as we become more dependent on the shales we will need to spend more and more just to keep production flat.

Today the U.S. imports 9 million bopd and that number will probable get down to no better than 8 million bopd. U.S. energy independence is not going to happen.

It is great that we have the technology to tap the shales but they are not going to save us.

The rapid decline in shale gas production is very bullish for natural gas prices. A cold winter could wipe out the current gas surplus and push price much higher.

Very bullish outlook for the onshore drillers and oilfield service firms.