DNR

Post Reply
setliff
Posts: 1823
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:15 pm

DNR

Post by setliff »

gets richer :D
now if the share price would show it. :roll:

Denbury Agrees to Acquire Gulf Coast Oil Field
Builds on Leading Position in Gulf Coast Enhanced Oil Recovery 05/01 07:30 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PLANO, Texas, May 1, 2012 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Denbury Resources Inc. (DNR:$19.19,00$0.15,000.79%) ("Denbury" or the "Company") today announced that it has entered into an agreement to acquire Thompson Field in Fort Bend County, Texas from a private seller for $360 million in cash and a production payment, described below. The acquisition is expected to close in early June and is subject to satisfactory completion of due diligence reviews and customary closing conditions. The purchase price is subject to standard purchase price adjustments for revenues and costs between the June 1, 2012 effective date and the closing date of the transaction.

Denbury plans to fund the purchase with approximately $213 million of the cash received from its 2012 non-core property sales and borrowings under its revolving credit facility. A significant portion of the purchase that will be funded with proceeds from the property sales is anticipated to qualify as a like-kind exchange. This qualification is expected to allow Denbury to defer paying approximately $30 million of cash taxes in 2012 on the taxable gains realized from the property sales.

Transaction Highlights

Thompson Field was discovered in the early 1930s by Gulf Oil, Hugh Roy Cullen, and Wesley West. The 8,454 acre field was jointly owned and operated by Chevron and ExxonMobil from 1932 until they sold their interests in separate transactions to the seller in 1999 (Chevron) and 2003 (ExxonMobil). Oil production from the field peaked in 1974 at approximately 41,000 barrels of oil per day ("Bbls/d").

The acquisition includes a nearly 100% working interest and 84.7% net revenue interest in the Thompson Field. The field is located approximately 18 miles west of Hastings Field that Denbury is currently flooding with carbon dioxide ("CO2"), and the current terminus of the Green Pipeline which transports CO2 from Denbury's source in Jackson Dome, Mississippi.

Net to Denbury's interest, the field is producing approximately 2,200 Bbls/d of oil and potential conventional (non-tertiary) reserves are estimated at approximately 17 million barrels of oil. Denbury plans to develop the conventional undeveloped reserves at Thompson Field over the next several years while it designs the field's CO2 flood. Annual development costs until the CO2 flood commences are estimated at approximately $12 million.

Thompson Field is similar to Hastings Field, producing oil from the Frio zone at similar depths, and is also believed to be an ideal candidate for a CO2 flood. Denbury estimates the field's original oil in place ("OOIP") at approximately 650 million barrels of oil, with the zones initially targeted for CO2 flood estimated to have approximately 300 million barrels of OOIP. Based on its other Gulf Coast CO2 floods, Denbury estimates that a CO2 flood of Thompson Field could recover between 30 million and 60 million barrels of oil. The capital costs of implementing a CO2 flood at Thompson Field are currently estimated at between $8 and $10 per barrel.

In the transaction, the seller will receive a production payment which equates to a 5% net revenue interest when oil production exceeds 3,000 Bbls/d and the field is under CO2 flood.

Phil Rykhoek, Denbury's President and CEO, commented, "We are excited about the opportunity Thompson Field presents and its strategic fit with our operations in the Gulf Coast region. Thompson Field is in close proximity to the Green Pipeline which will allow it to be connected to this CO2 transportation system with a minimal level of pipeline infrastructure spending. Further, in light of their similarities, we expect to use the knowledge gained from our CO2 flood at Hastings Field to optimize the planned CO2 flood of the Thompson Field. The acquisition adds to our deep inventory of tertiary development projects in the Gulf Coast region that we plan to develop with our natural source of CO2 from Jackson Dome and anthropogenic CO2 sources in the region. While we are still in the process of incorporating the field into our development plan, we anticipate first tertiary oil production will not occur prior to 2017. The acquisition bolsters our ability to deliver consistent growth in tertiary oil production and proved reserves for the remainder of the decade."

Conference Call

Denbury management will discuss the transaction on the Company's first quarter 2012 results conference call that is scheduled for Thursday, May 3, 2012 at 10:00 A.M. (Central). Interested parties are invited to listen to a live broadcast of the conference call that will be accessible through the Company's website at www.denbury.com.
dan_s
Posts: 37310
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:22 am

Re: DNR

Post by dan_s »

Nice fit for DNR. They have a huge asset in their CO2 reserves that the market really doesn't understand. They can take this old field and get much more oil from it with a CO2 flood. 2,000 to 20,000 bopd is not out of reach.
Dan Steffens
Energy Prospectus Group
bearcatbob

Re: DNR

Post by bearcatbob »

Dan, How does injecting CO2 into an oil field increase production? Is it simply pressurization?

Bob
cviller
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 7:44 am

Re: DNR

Post by cviller »

Google "CO2 flooding" and you can read easy-to-understand explanations of how it works.
dan_s
Posts: 37310
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:22 am

Re: DNR

Post by dan_s »

CO2 adds pressure but it also strips more oil from the rock. Check out the DNR website for more details. DNR's HUGE CO2 reserves are an asset that Wall Street is missing.
Dan Steffens
Energy Prospectus Group
setliff
Posts: 1823
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:15 pm

Re: DNR

Post by setliff »

8:35AM Denbury Resources beats by $0.04, beats on revs (DNR) 19.25 : Reports Q1 (Mar) earnings of $0.41 per share, excluding non-recurring items, $0.04 better than the Capital IQ Consensus Estimate of $0.37; revenues rose 25.5% year/year to $645.1 mln vs the $634.4 mln consensus.

complete report here---

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/denbury-r ... 00889.html
dan_s
Posts: 37310
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:22 am

Re: DNR

Post by dan_s »

DNR EPS of $0.41 (adjusted for special items) hit my forecast on the nose. I will listen to their CC and update my forecast model this evening. - Dan

May 3 (Reuters) - Oil-focused producer Denbury Resources Inc posted a better-than-expected quarterly profit, helped by higher oil sales volumes, especially from its key Bakken shale assets.

U.S. crude oil prices rose 9 percent to average $103 per barrel in January-March from the year-earlier quarter.

Net profit rose to $113 million, or 29 cents per share, compared with a loss of $14 million, or 4 cents per share, a year earlier.

Excluding items, the company earned 41 cents a share.

Analysts on average had expected the company to earn 38 cents per share, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.

Denbury's revenue rose 25 percent to $645.1 million.

The company continues to expect total production to average 68,625-73,625 barrels of oil equivalent per day in 2012.

Denbury shares closed at $19.25 on Wednesday on New York Stock Exchange.
Dan Steffens
Energy Prospectus Group
setliff
Posts: 1823
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:15 pm

Re: DNR

Post by setliff »

i think the sell off in dnr, while partially is due to general mkt-- is mostly because of the projected flat production rest of year and pull back in bakken. this is not a growth company, yet-- it appears they are placing their resources on the various tertiary projects with growth towards the future---way out in the future.

i will be bailing on this one--been essentially dead money for two+ years. tell me if i am wrong. :cry:
Post Reply