Changes to EPG oil & gas prices used for forecasts

Post Reply
dan_s
Posts: 35537
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:22 am

Changes to EPG oil & gas prices used for forecasts

Post by dan_s »

As of today, I will be using the following oil and gas prices in my forecast. My current stock valuations will be updated in my September 30th newsletter. Since most of the companies have some production hedged, don't expect big changes to the valuations. I will post updated forecast/valuation models to the EPG website as I complete them. I'm starting with Small-Caps today.

Period: Oil Price / NGas Price

Q3 2024: $75.00 / $2.15 < WTI oil price stays the same and HH NGas price up $0.15
Q4 2024: $70.00 / $2.75 < WTI down $10 and HH NGas up $0.25

Year 2025: $75.00 / $3.50 < WTI down $5.00 and HH NGas stays the same.

If we have a normal winter, the NGas prices could go much higher. Surplus of NGas in storage will be gone by December, 2024.

I agree with HFI's forecast below that unless there is a significant global recession, oil demand won't go lower in 2025 and the "Right Price" for WTI will be in the $70 to $80 range. Results of the U.S. election will have minimal impact on the oil and gas prices. Wars in the Middle East and Russia/Ukraine could have a big impact on oil supplies.


Note from HFI this morning:

On Dec 14, 2023, I published a piece titled, "Memo - It Can't Be That Simple." At the time, I wrote that the Fed interest rate hikes that started in mid-2022 coupled with elevated oil prices caused oil demand to surprise to the downside. More specifically, this is what I said:

The problem with being a specialist from time to time is that you are so into the weeds, you forget you are in the forest. In the case of the oil market, I even wrote on June 10 that the odds of demand surprising to the upside was minimal, and as a result, one should not expect a super tight market. But my bias led me to believe that the Fed was going to be unsuccessful in fending off elevated oil prices. On the other hand, I also knew that the US SPR release was real and those were real supplies. In hindsight, a more aggressive reduction in risk was appropriate given the "dark macro clouds" I saw on the horizon, and that was the simple mistake I made.

In essence, the lesson of don't fight the Fed rings true once again. While I'm not writing this as a mea culpa piece, looking back, it was just that straightforward. If the odds of demand surprising to the upside are nonexistent, it's likely time to step aside.

Fast forwarding to today, the market is pricing in a higher probability for a 0.5% cut than a 0.25% cut. Whether or not it's 0.5% or 0.25% is beside the point, the real conclusion you should arrive at is that the Fed views its effort in fighting off inflation as successful.

What's particularly interesting about the timing of all this is that the oil market is now finally buying into the weak oil demand thesis. While we thought at the start of 2024 that oil demand had the possibility of surprising to the upside, we were completely off on China, and the subsequent downward revision in demand.

With the consensus now firmly believing that oil demand will disappoint in 2025, we think the market has gone too far. If I take a step back and look at the bigger picture, this is the start of the Fed reducing interest rates. The market expects that by the middle of 2025, the Fed Fund's rate will be down close to ~3%. If that's the case, the outlook for oil demand is likely to surprise to the upside barring any unforeseen macro shocks...
Dan Steffens
Energy Prospectus Group
Post Reply